Cardin sponsors bill to eliminate crack vs. powder cocaine sentencing disparity

Press Release of Senator Cardin
CARDIN SPONSORS BILL TO ELIMINATE SENTENCING DISPARITY BETWEEN CRACK AND POWDER COCAINE

Contact: Sue Walitsky: 202-224-4524
Thursday, October 15, 2009

Click here for associated multimedia.

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today joined Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL), Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Crime and Drugs Subcommittee Chairman Arlen Specter (D-PA), and six other Senators, introducing legislation to eliminate the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. The bill, the Fair Sentencing Act, would refocus scarce federal resources toward large scale, violent traffickers and increase penalties for the worst drug offenders. According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, restoring sentencing parity would do more than any other policy change to close the gap in incarceration rates between African Americans and whites. Senator Cardin has worked closely with Senator Durbin, the bill’s author, to spotlight this race-based disparity. The Obama Administration endorsed eliminating the sentencing differential at a hearing in April.

“The American drug epidemic is a serious problem that we must address, but our drug laws must be smart, fair and rational. The current law is a civil rights injustice. It disproportionately affects minorities and has contributed to the enormous growth in the prison population. It also misdirects limited federal resources on low-level individuals instead of targeting major traffickers,” said Senator Cardin. ”I commend Senator Durbin for leading a strong coalition in the Senate that understands the urgent need to eliminate this gross disparity.”

Under current law, possession of five grams of crack cocaine (roughly the weight of two sugar cubes) triggers a mandatory minimum five-year prison sentence, while trafficking 500 grams (approximately one pound) of powder cocaine triggers the same sentence. The so-called 100:1 sentencing disparity has been in place since 1986. The Fair Sentencing Act would eliminate the disparity, treating crack and powder cocaine equally.

The dramatically higher penalties for crack have disproportionately affected the African American community. While only 25 percent of crack users are African American, they constituted 81 percent of those convicted for crack offenses in 2007. The current drug sentencing policy is also the single greatest cause of the record levels of incarceration in our country. One in every thirty-one Americans is in prison, on parole, or on probation, including one in eleven African-Americans. Over 50% of current federal inmates are imprisoned for drug crimes.

The Fair Sentencing Act will:
Eliminate the sentencing disparity by instituting a 1:1 ratio for crack and powder sentencing.
Increase the quantity of crack cocaine needed to trigger a mandatory sentence. Under this new law, possession of 500 grams of crack and 500 grams of powder cocaine would trigger a mandatory minimum sentence of five years. Similarly, 5,000 grams of crack or powder would trigger a 10-year sentence.
Direct federal resources toward large-scale drug trafficking cases and violent offenders by increasing the number of aggravating factors subject to higher penalties.
A broad coalition of legal, law enforcement, civil rights, and religious groups from across the political spectrum supports eliminating the crack-powder disparity, including Attorney General Holder, Los Angeles Police Chief Bill Bratton, Miami Police Chief John Timoney, the American Bar Association, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, the National Black Police Association, and the United Methodist Church.

The bill also is co-sponsored by Judiciary Committee Members Feingold (D-WI), Whitehouse (D-RI), Kaufman (D-DE), and Franken (D-MN). Senators Kerry (D-MA) and Dodd (D-CT) are original co-sponsors.

5 Comments »

  1. 1

    Hello,

    I have more of a question. What is going on with bill H.R 3245? Is theis bill going to pass, or is it presumed to pass by the end of this year? If so, when is it going to be voted on? If not, when do you presume that it will pass?

    Kind Regards,
    Luciana Jackson

    Comment by Luciana Jackson — November 8, 2009 @ 10:43 am

  2. 2

    My comment is that I am very happy with the new law and I will be even more happier when it finally passes. My husband is currently serving 5yrs of federal time for having less than 2grams of crack cocaine. This new law is a blessing and it gives people a second chance and its fair. I just want to say thank you.

    Comment by Monique Clements — November 16, 2009 @ 2:35 pm

  3. 3

    I would also like to express that if more employers started to judge employees by the work that they perform that we would have less people in jail for selling drugs. Not to ever defend the situation but just speaking from the other point of view. Stop viewing an inmate as a inmate once they have already served there time for the crime that they have committed. They are humans just as well as you and I and they truly deserve to have that second chance. Change is very possible if people sometimes let judge people for who they truly are instead of who they presume them to be.21 months in and still counting. I will always be here Kalon.Much thanks and appreciation to all the people on this congress that are helping to make this bill possible. God Bless.

    Comment by Monique Clements — November 16, 2009 @ 2:41 pm

  4. 4

    The president really needs to focus on this issue. My son is going to sentencing next month and what they are doing to Black men is horrible. The prosecuter Vince Lombardi is so racist. My son did co operate with them, and now his life and our family is in danger. For me the government plays games with our lives, and I’m disappointed with myself as a black woman that I voted for him.

    Comment by sandra — November 25, 2009 @ 10:07 pm

  5. 5

    I have a son sentenced to 10 years for less than 5g of crack cocaine on 12/24/2009. When is this law going to be enacted and why does it take so long to correct injustices that affect our famalies. My youngest son went before he was murdered 05/27/2007 served 3yrs time and 3yrs on paper for the same offence. In addition to the this crime he was 18 and was dating a 16yr old girl. The young lady recieved a call on her cell phone from another young man, my son became enraged with jealousy and physically abused the young lady. I agree that he should went to jail for the battery because I have daughters and granddaughters and would not want this to happen to them. What hurt me and I can’t understand is why he had to be classified as a sex offender. The sentence was virtually death. My son did commit battery but he did not rape anyone. What life can be had when you are a young black man listed as a felon and sex offender. My son did not recieve a sentence that could in any be viewed as rehabilitative, this was a death sentence. I watched the election polling before President Obama was elected. Sarah Palin’s daughter was impregnated and gave birth to a baby. I never once heard anyone mention him serving time or being listed a a sex offender. Almost all of AMERICA’S founding fathers had slaves with whom they had unwanted sex and children to be sold into slavery, They are not listed as SEX Offender’s or pedophiles. They are called our forefathers!!

    Comment by Adrienne Bolds — December 2, 2009 @ 9:39 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment



badge/news.win.jpg

Connect to ICC

Latest Tweet from @insidecharmcity

RSS & Social Media

Enter your email address to subscribe to our Daily Update:

Delivered by FeedBurner

News Links


MD Bloggers

 

Archives

Monthly

Authors

Categories