Some in the pro-life community in the Baltimore area and, presumably, some in the Archdiocese of Baltimore are not exactly thrilled with the upcoming ascendance to office of Mayor by City Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake. Rawlings-Blake will take office when the resignation of Mayor Sheila Dixon becomes effective on February 4.
All of this stems from actions taken by Rawlings-Blake in the latter part of 2009 when she shepherded a bill through city council regulating crisis pregnancy centers. This was the first bill of its kind to become law anywhere in America (state legislation failed in two states.) Montgomery County Council later voted on a similar measure.
Here’s an excerpt from The Baltimore Sun on November 23, 2009:
The measure, introduced by council President Stephanie C. Rawlings-Blake at the behest of Planned Parenthood of Maryland, would require that crisis pregnancy centers that do not provide abortions or birth control post signs saying so.
The Archdiocese of Baltimore opposed this bill and cited a Rawlings-Blake comment that, “Crisis Pregnancy Centers do good work.”
The proposal was written under the guise of providing complete information to women visiting the crisis pregnancy centers. NARAL and Planned Parenthood both pushed the measure while opposing amendments that would also apply a similar standard to abortion clinics or other counseling centers who do make referrals for abortions or birth control.
Three members of City Council opposed the proposal. The Baltimore Sun briefly mentioned this opposition November 24:
“It should not just apply to these four centers,” said Councilman James B. Kraft, who tried unsuccessfully last week to broaden the scope of the bill. “But if you hold out yourself as a facility that gives advice to a young woman who finds herself pregnant – whether she wants abortion, comprehensive birth control, prenatal care, postnatal care – there should be a sign saying we do not provide advice on this one option.”
Newsbusters points out one interesting fact that the Sun left out of their story – Rawlings-Blake voted against a measure proposed by Kraft that would require abortion clinics to provide a list of services they do not provide.
The Catholic Review reported on this vote:
On a 5-10 vote, the council rejected an amendment offered by Councilman James B. Kraft that would have broadened the bill to require abortion clinics to post signs indicating what services they do not provide.
When a woman is facing a decision about abortion, Kraft said, it’s important for her to have access to information about all services – including abortion, adoption, birth control, counseling, financial assistance, postnatal assistance and prenatal services.
“Each place should give her every bit of information it can,” Kraft said.
Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, chief sponsor of the bill, voted against Kraft’s amendment. Despite the fact that there were no amendments offered that would have required abortion providers to post signs saying that they offer abortions, Rawlings-Blake told the council she opposed making abortion clinics post such signs because it could open them up to violence.
“There’s a long history of violence against abortion providers,” she insisted.
I remember there being some talk before this measure became law that the Archdiocese of Baltimore would consider litigation, but I have yet to see any evidence of such a lawsuit materializing. In fact, I previously heard that it probably would not happen. However, there is a concern by many of the critics of this law that it has opened the door for further regulation of what crisis pregnancy centers do and say by politicians who favor abortion who are simply grandstanding for their own political future.
BY:
Jeff Quinton @
2010-01-08 ,
12:23 pm
Category: Abortion, Baltimore City |
2 Comments
Recent Comments